Perhaps it is not often that the smirking secularists at Rolling Stone magazine hit the target, but they have when it comes to what’s ultimately behind the current arguments over Intelligent Design (ID). From Matt Taibbi’s article “Darwinian Warfare” in the November 3 issue:
But ID is also revealing itself here in Pennsylvania in another form. It’s having a coming-out party as a deliberate satirical echo of the great liberal lie of the modern age: the idea that progressive science and religion can co-exist.
For a century or so since Nietzsche, popular culture in the West has operated according to an uneasy truce, in which God both is and is not dead. We teach our children the evidence-based materialism of science and tell them they can believe in God and a faith-based morality in their spare time if they like.
And in some parts of the country, we celebrate Scopes as a victory over ignorance, while still insisting that we do not also celebrate it as a victory over religion.
What these endless Scopes sequels tell us is that somewhere many years from now we’re going to hit a fork in the road, beyond which this have-it-both-ways philosophy isn’t going to fly anymore. Is God dead or isn’t he? Are we believers, or not? They know what we think. They just want us to come out and say it.
